can Frogger teach us ecology?

What can Frogger teach us about ecology?

I’m sure most of you are familiar with the Konami video game Frogger that first appeared in arcades in 1981. I’ve certainly burned my fair share of quarters on this game – despite my significant lack of video game skills – just for the fun of it. But, I’ve been wondering lately, could one of the most iconic arcade games of the 20th century also be a good teaching tool for ecology and environmental studies?

Could one of the most iconic arcade games of the 20th century also be a good teaching tool?

I definitely learned a lot of arithmetic back in the eighties from the computer game MathBlaster (which I’m excited to see is now available in its most recent incarnation for free at and a lot of geography in the nineties from Where in the World is Carmen Sandiego. Have we biologists dropped the ball on creating educational games that are also fun and broadly appealing? I think some biocreativity may be in order here!

As-is, Frogger can help teach some of the basics of ecology. Mr. Frogger, of course, likes to eat insects, has a habitat preference of lily pads near stream banks (preferably far away from cars) and enjoys the company of lady frogs. Major causes of mortality are apparently vehicles, alligators and snakes. I forgive the game a few inaccuracies, such as frogs die when they land in water and turtles are as large as Volkswagens that travel in packs of three.

“In the United States, roadkill has surpassed hunting in its effect on vertebrate mortality.” Alisa Coffin, 2007 

These days, I think a re-vamped Frogger could be really useful in illustrating how big of a threat roads actually are to amphibian populations. To get serious for a minute, several recent reports – including a 2007 paper by research geographer Alisa Coffin in the Journal of Transport Geography – indicate that road-associated mortalities may be the number one cause of wildlife mortality in the United States.

Scientists around the world are now studying the myriad effects roads can have on amphibians in addition to turning them into pancakes. Chemical runoff from roads treated with de-icing chemicals has now been linked to mass mortaily of newts and was recently discovered to drastically reduce the size of egg masses in some frog species. In addition, Coffin reports in her 2007 paper that even simple traffic noise can affect animal behavior. Some birds, for example, (and perhaps some frogs, too) have to sing more loudly in the presence of traffic noise, thereby spending more energy on communication that could otherwise be used to find food or mates. Roads (divided highways in particular) act as significant barriers to dispersal and migration of animals, fragmenting habitat and genetically separating populations over time. Roads can also increase human access to rural areas, which can lead to increased hunting pressure and/or facilitate the spread of non-native species. “Cumulatively,” Coffin writes, “road-effects interact with each other when roads are considered as [eco]systems.”

Photographs of egg masses of a salamander (A. maculatum) and wood frog (R. sylvatica) from forest and roadside pools in the Adirondack Mountain Region of New York from Nancy E. Karraker & James P. Gibbs 2011 paper in Volume 664, Number 1, 213-218 entitled, "Contrasting road effect signals in reproduction of long- versus short-lived amphibians".

Photographs of egg masses of a salamander (top) and wood frog (bottom) from forest and roadside pools in the Adirondack Mountain Region of New York from Nancy E. Karraker & James P. Gibbs' 2011 paper in the journal Hydrobiologica (Volume 664, Number 1, pgs 213-218) entitled, "Contrasting road effect signals in reproduction of long- versus short-lived amphibians".

“To educate better…We need to see the road through the eyes of the frog.” -Dr. Mark Widome, 1991

Roadkill has been the topic of several recent news articles and blogs by National Geographic, The New York Times  and New Scientist. In fact, the problem of roadkill is so serious and understudied that The University of California at Davis recently formed the Road Ecology Center, dedicated to the emerging field of “road ecology”. Think roadkill is only a problem for wildlife? Think again. A 1991 article in the medical journal Pediatrics by Dr. Mark Windome used Frogger as an illustrative tool to describe the significant threat traffic crossings have on juvenile human survivorship (a problem that still abounds)!

Roadkill isn’t just on major highways, it even extends to protected areas. The photo below, for example, was taken along a relatively quiet park road between Buescher and Bastrop State Parks in Bastrop County, Texas. During a spring field trip in 2009, there were hundreds of roadkill frogs along Park Road 11 (this is “protected” habitat, folks!). Interestingly, the frog carcasses were all dominated by red imported fire ants (Solenopsis invicta) and could be facilitating the spread of these ants by providing convenient food supplies.

Frog Roadkill in Protected Area

Unfortunately, Frogger isn't all fun and games. This particular individual made a meal for a colony of invasive red imported fire ants (Solenopsis invicta), potentially facilitating their spread. This photo was taken in a protected state park in Texas. Photo by H. Gillespie (2009).

So what’s being done about road mortality? 

In a real-life examination of Frogger’s plight, Dr. Tom Langen and colleagues studied amphibian and reptile road mortality in upstate New York (reported in a 2009 article in the Journal of Wildlife Management). By simply recording when and where amphibian roadkill occurred, these scientists were able to identify “hotspots” of amphibian road mortality. These hotspots, mostly located where wetlands came within 100 meters of the road, can be used to determine where to place wildlife barriers, underground crossing tunnels and signs warning drivers to slow down and watch out. Knowledge of hotspots can even be used to predict and avoid where roadkill may be greatest when planning new roads.

All too often, however, the burden of “doing something” about roadkill falls to local citizens and organizations. For example, many citizen groups around the country have started amphibian crossing projects in their communities, to assist Frogger in crossing safely. Other groups also collect roadkill data through educational programs such as The Roadkill Project started by a professor from Simmons College in Boston to teach his students about wildlife and road mortality. Many state and regional programs throughout the country are now following the lead of the California Roadkill Observation System, by creating online networks for citizens and scientists alike to photograph, identify and map wildlife roadkill.

A handful of artists have made roadkill awareness their platform of choice including Pennsylvania photographer Joy Hunsberger, whose work focuses on portraits of roadkill animals, and University of Central Arkansas art instructor Carey Voss who constructs papier-mâché models of roadkill animals filled with wildflower seeds that she installs on country roads. Some artists are taking things even farther, including British artist Adam Morrigan who literally creates art out of roadkill near his home using indigenous methods of taxidermy. There are also some clever biocreative projects coming from groups such as the W.A.T.E.R. Institute at the Occidental Arts & Ecology Center in Sonoma County, California which produced the faux-news video below to raise awareness of the effects of roads on migrating California tiger salamanders. One of my favorite instances of Frogger-related biocreativity is from a couple of technology hackers who created a remote control Frogger with a Roomba vaccum cleaner and drove it across 6th Street during the SXSW festival in Austin, Texas back in 2006. I’m fairly certain it wasn’t in the name of roadkill awareness.

Interested in throwing your biocreative hat in the ring? Save The Frogs, a non-profit organization dedicated exclusively to amphibian conservation, hosts annual art and poetry contests to raise awareness of Frogger’s plight. The submission deadline is October 15, 2011. An entire page of the Save the Frogs website is dedicated to increasing awareness of the effects of roads on amphibians.

Getting back to Frogger, can popular video games be one way to increase science literacy? In this high-tech era it is becoming increasingly easy to design games and apps that could be used for this purpose. Perhaps there is a biocreative programmer out there who could design a new generation of Frogger that would educate players about road ecology, with a broader emphasis on many species and the diverse impacts of roads on wildlife. What if such a game could be come as educational as it was popular? While we’re waiting for that to happen, you can play Frogger online. And, if you want to be impressed by wicked Frogger-playing skills (i.e. not mine), you might enjoy this video.

What biocreative games have you discovered that may help increase scientific literacy?


Happy Monday, everyone! Just wanted to report that there’s a great article in today’s PsiVid (on Scientific American Blogs) about Dr. Carin Bondar’s recent adventures at the ‘Science Film Workshop’ at Friday Harbor Laboratories on San Juan Island, Washington. For anyone interested in such endeavors, she reports that there are two upcoming fall 2011 classes in October and November at Friday Harbor Laboratories and the Vancouver Aquarium, respectively. I want to go!

Biocreativity on the Road: Biology + Art in San Antonio, Texas


This gallery contains 4 photos.

I had a great time in San Antonio this weekend and discovered some really fun biocreativity on display. One of Donald Lipski’s F.I.S.H. in San Antonio, TX. Photo by Cole Weatherby. First, riding the water taxi up to the San … Continue reading

visualizing science is cool (and necessary)!


There’s a great article by Amy Wallace in today’s New York Times (“Science to Art, and Vice Versa”) on two really interesting artist-scientists. This is not a biology-related article, but it does address some of the concerns from my first biocreativity post. Thanks to my Uncle Phil for passing it on. I think Matthew McCory was right on when he said (and I quote from the article), “The scientists at Northwestern do physics, chemistry and biology really well, but they generally don’t have a clue when it comes to making good-looking images,” he said. “A lot was getting lost in translation.” Of course, this is not something unique to Northwestern. Luckily, there are folks like McCrory and Nathalie Miebach working to improve science communication through artistic visualization projects. Should visualization and presentation skills be just as critical as knowing how to analyze your data? If so, how do we begin to improve the artistic toolboxes of scientists?

‘connections’ at the metropolitan museum of art

Connections | Metropolitan Museum of ArtI am absolutely in love with the Metropolitan Museum of Art’s 2011 Connections series.  What I really love is that Connections is that it’s a different take on the traditional art exhibit, which usually features a single artist or group of similar artists. Connections seeks to, well, connect otherwise unrelated art + artifacts through simple yet fascinating topics. While I long to see some of these treasures in person, the web-based audiovisual “tours” are simply and elegantly presented to really let the work stand out. I also love that this series introduces us to the folks who work in the museum, so we can learn more about their interests and passions.

Of course, the ones I find most enticing are those with biocreative themes: Birding (3/2/2011), Water (4/6/2011), Bugs (6/15/2011) + Crocodiles (6/29/2011). The most recent of these – Trees (7/6/2011) – combines everything from artists depictions of trees, tree symbology, photographs of trees and even things made of trees (furniture, sculpture, curios, etc.).

Wouldn’t it be cool if you had access to the Met’s collections to make your own Connections piece? Well, you (kind of) can! Choose a topic, search the Met’s collections database and fill your own “My Met Gallery” with up to 50 items. Unfortunately, I can’t find a way to share my gallery publicly, but I made a fun herpetology-themed exhibit. Here is one of my favorite items in my gallery: Skink and Snake (Tokage and Hebi), from Picture Book of Selected Insects with Crazy Poems (Ehon Mushi Erabi). Maybe gallery sharing is something I can suggest to the Met for next year. It would be really interesting to let the public create and share their own web-based Connections galleries via the online collection database! In the meantime, watch for new Connections episodes every Wednesday; I hope they keep doing this well into the future! What’s in your gallery?